What a Tweeting Mess!

Back in August, I posted about Twitter filing for the mark Retweet. The USPTO has since sent Twitter's legal counsel an Office Action suspending Retweet's application based on prior filings. However, let's take a closer look at these filings & perhaps we can figure out where Retweet is going to end up - abandoned or a real, live Federal trademark.

Here's what the USPTO is telling Twitter:

"Although the examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered marks which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d), the examining attorney encloses information regarding pending Application Serial Nos. 77724346, 77802071, 77797006, 77697186, 77749897, 77746004, 77725866, 77701645, 77695071...

Action on this application will be suspended pending the disposition of these application upon the applicant’s response to the office action."

Wooo, that's a whole lot of sevens! Okay, let's look at each one, in order...

TweetLaw is currently suspended pending the outcome of Tweet, which is owned by Twitter.

tweetdealz is currently suspended pending the outcome of a whole lot of filings, which includes Tweet.

TweetTV is currently suspended pending the outcome of quite a few filings. And yup, Tweet is one of them.

Cotweet is being published for opposition. This filing went to publication on the 3rd of this month. So far, no oppositions have been filed. If no oppositions are filed, this filing will move to registration.

TweetNetworking is currently suspended pending the outcome of 7 filings, which include Tweet.

tweetworking is also suspended because of other filings. And guess what? Tweet is in the mix.

TweetDeck is suspended because of Tweet.

tweetPhoto has filed using Twitter's pretty distinctive looking bubbly blue font but their refusal has to do with descriptiveness: "The relevant definition of ‘tweet’ is “[a]n entry posted on the microblogging service Twitter.” See attached. The relevant definition of ‘photo’ is “photograph.” See attached. Thus, the term ‘tweetphoto’ means an entry posted on Twitter to which a photograph is attached."

TweetMarks looks pretty to good to go except the USPTO is waiting for clarification on a specimen from them. They have until December 9th of this year to respond or the mark becomes abandoned.

Wowza. Okay, let's take a step back & look at these filings. A good chunk of them are suspended based on Twitter's filing for Tweet so let's look at that filing:

"Action on this application will be suspended pending the disposition of Application Serial Nos. 77695071, 77697186, and 77701645 upon receipt of the applicant’s response resolving the following."

TweetMarks, CoTweet, and tweetPhoto are the marks mentioned. Look familiar?

So what do you think the outcome of Retweet or Tweet will be?

- Mention our blog & receive $25 off of our Premium Package -

- Put BLOG in the Contact Name field -

Distinctiveness & Descriptiveness Continuum

Here's a visual snapshot of the USPTO's Distinctiveness & Descriptiveness Continuum. Click to view a larger version. I hope it makes the PTO's guidelines a little clearer plus I like charts, graphs & whatnot :)

So far I've written about merely descriptive marks so I'll be sure to hit the other sections & re-post this visual with links to each new post.

Descriptive Trademarks

The title here is a bit misleading as descriptive words are not typically allowed to be registered on the USPTO’s trademark Principal Register. Let’s back up a little...

One of the main points (some would argue THE main point) of having a Federal trademark is to have exclusive rights to a name, a logo or a slogan within your industry. Given that, words that “merely describe” the goods or services are not going to be allowed.

There are two main reasons the USPTO provides:

1) “to prevent the owner of a mark from inhibiting competition in the sale of particular goods”

What this means: The owner of the descriptive word(s) can’t trademark it as it could create a stranglehold, of sorts, on the word(s) within the industry. For instance, the word “trademark” is disclaimed on our Federal trademark registration on TradeMark Express, meaning we’re not claiming exclusive rights to the word “trademark” as it’s a descriptive word for our industry.

2) “to maintain freedom of the public to use the language involved, thus avoiding the possibility of harassing infringement suits by the registrant against others who use the mark when advertising or describing their own products”

What this means: People should have the freedom to use descriptive words in advertising or in describing their goods/services. Using the example above, other companies offering trademark services should be able to use the word “trademark” to describe their services, in their advertising, etc.

So How do I Know if my Name is Descriptive?

As with anything trademark, it’s never black & white. Each situation is going to vary from the next. The basic litmus test is “does this word describe the product and/or service?” and if the answer is yes, then you’ve most likely got a descriptive name on your hands.

It is not necessary that a term describe all of the purposes, functions, characteristics, or features of a product/service to be considered merely descriptive; it is enough if the term describes one significant function, attribute, or property.

Here are some examples provided by the USPTO:

• APPLE PIE held merely descriptive of potpourri (most likely because the words describe the scent)
• BED & BREAKFAST REGISTRY held merely descriptive of lodging reservations services
• MALE-P.A.P. TEST held merely descriptive of clinical pathological immunoassay testing services for detecting and monitoring prostatic cancer

If you’d like help determining if your name is descriptive, please leave a comment or email me at dc@tmexpress.com

- Mention our blog & receive $25 off of our Premium Package -

- Put BLOG in the Contact Name field -